لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
fourteen. Within the light from the position explained previously mentioned, it is actually concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to generally be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded for no fault of his have and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the duration of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it proper on the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision of your Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for your Supreme Court from the United States is accessible around the court’s website.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature in the petitioner. Read more
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for your accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
Any court could seek out to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
The regulation as proven in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court will be the highest court during the United States. Decrease courts about the federal level contain the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its possess judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each individual state is usually referred to given that the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, While state courts can also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment from the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے more info اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and prospective hazard to local residents. Ultimately, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have damaging effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Improvement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.